California State University, USA
* Corresponding author

Article Main Content

This paper presents an experimental study to measure mechanical properties of bonded concrete specimens. The bond between freshly mixed and hardened concrete has been a concern in repair and retrofit projects as well as staged construction of concrete members. This concern has roots in the time-dependent behavior of concrete, beginning with early-age concrete and continuing with long-term performance and durability of concrete. Moreover, environmental conditions generally complicate the behavior of concrete and resulted deformations such as shrinkage and creep. Application of chemical adhesives and epoxies is a common technique to enhance the bond at the interface of old and new concrete elements. The presented methodology includes preparation of bonded specimens with application of grout and adhesive agents. Mechanical strengths of specimens have been reported based on compressive, tensile, flexural, and shear testing. Results indicate that bonding agents are more effective in tensile and shear behavior of bonded samples.

References

  1. FIP (Fédération International de la Précontrainte) Commission on Practical Construction. Repair and strengthening of concrete structure, London: Thomas Telford, 1991.
     Google Scholar
  2. ACI (American Concrete Institute) Committee 503. Guide for the selection of polymer adhesives with concrete, ACI 503.5R-92. Detroit, MI: American Concrete Institute, 1992.
     Google Scholar
  3. Knab L., and C. B. Spring. “Evaluation of test methods for measuring the bond strength of Portland-cement based repair material to concrete,” Cement, Concrete and Aggregate, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3-14, 1989.
     Google Scholar
  4. Rizzo, E. M., and M. B. Sobelman. “Selection criteria for concrete repair material,” Concrete International, vol. 11, no. 9, pp.46-49, 1989.
     Google Scholar
  5. Tracy, R. G., and R. S. Fling. “Rehabilitation strategies,” Concrete International, vol. 11, no. 9, pp.41-45, 1989.
     Google Scholar
  6. ACI (American Concrete Institute) Committee 548. Guide for the application of epoxy and latex adhesives for bonding freshly mixed and hardened concretes, ACI 548.11R-12. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  7. Tehrani, F. M. “Performance of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete in Beam-Column Connections,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  8. Tehrani, F. M., and R. M. Serrano. “Crack Propagation of Concrete Ties Prestressed with Single Strand Tendons,” Journal of Civil Engineering Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 71-81, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  9. McComb, C., and F. M. Tehrani. “Enhancement of Shear Transfer in Composite Deck with Mechanical Fasteners,” Journal of Engineering Structures, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 251-261, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  10. Shadravan, B., and F. M. Tehrani. “A Review of Direct Shear Testing Configurations for Bond between Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Sheets on Concrete and Masonry Substrates,” Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 740-751, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  11. Soto, A., and F. M. Tehrani. “Investigation of Crack Propagation in Steel-Concrete Composite Beams using Fiber Reinforcement,” Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 956-962, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  12. Miller, N. M., and F. M. Tehrani. “Mechanical Properties of Rubberized Lightweight Aggregate Concrete,” Journal of Construction and Building Materials, vol. 147, no. 30, pp. 264-271, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  13. Tehrani, F. M., and N. M. Miller. “Tire-derived Aggregate Cementitious Materials: A Review of Mechanical Properties,” in Cement-based Materials, Ed. by H. Saleh. London, UK: IntechOpen, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  14. Tehrani, F. M., J. Carreon, and N. Miller. “An Investigation of Tire-derived Lightweight Aggregate Concrete,” in ACI Special Publication SP-334-5, Ed. by ACI Committee 555, no. 334, pp. 68-98, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  15. Nazari, M., F. M. Tehrani, M. Ansari, B. Jeevanlal, F. Rahman, and R. Farshidpour. “Green Strategies for Design and Construction of Non-Auto Transportation Infrastructure,” Report 19-17, San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  16. Tehrani, F. M., M. Nazari, D. Truong, and R. Farshidpour. “Sustainability of Tire-Derived Aggregate Concrete: A Case Study on Energy, Emissions, Economy, and ENVISION,” Proc. International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2019: Leading Resilient Communities through the 21st Century, Los Angeles, CA: ASCE, (November 6-9, 2019), pp. 399-408, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  17. Tehrani, F. M. Rāhnamā-ye Jāme‘-e Līkā, [The Comprehensive Guide to LECA, in Persian], New Edition, Tehran, Iran: Omīdān, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  18. Tehrani, F. M., R. Farshidpour, M. Pouramini, M. Mousavi, and A. N. Esfahani. “Sustainability Rating of Lightweight Expanded Clay Aggregates using Energy Inputs and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Life-cycle Analysis,” The Sixth International Symposium on Life Cycle Civil Engineering, Ghent, Belgium: IALCCE, (October 2018), pp. 2989-2993, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  19. Tehrani, F. M. 2019. Notes on Fiber-Reinforced Lightweight-Aggregate Structural Concrete and Concrete Masonry, ESCSI E-Newsletter, September 2019.
     Google Scholar
  20. Tehrani, F. M. 2019. Deploying and Rating Sustainable Practices for Resilient Bridge Infrastructure. Keynote Lecture, Proc. The Fifth International Conference on Bridges, Tehran, Iran: Amirkabir University of Technology. (December 17-18, 2019): MS05.
     Google Scholar
  21. Bonyadian, S., M. Mohammadi, B. Foroutanmehr, and F. M. Tehrani. “An Experimental Investigation of Internally-Cured Concrete Application for Bridge Decks,” The Fifth International Conference on Bridges, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran. (December 17-18, 2019), no. MS02, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  22. Tehrani, F. M. 2020. Service Life Prediction of Structural Lightweight Concrete Using Transport Properties. ESCSI Report 4363, October 2020, Chicago, IL: Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Institute.
     Google Scholar
  23. Santos, P. M. D., and E. N. B. S. Júlio. “Factors affecting bond between new and old concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 449-456, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  24. Austin, S., P. Robins, and Y. Pan, “Shear Bond Testing of Concrete Repairs,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1067-1076, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  25. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) C39 / C39M-17b. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  26. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) C78 / C78M-16. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading), West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  27. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) C496 / C496M-11. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2004.
     Google Scholar